Friday, December 27, 2019

Middle-Aged Childhood - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2379 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/03/13 Category Sociology Essay Level High school Tags: Childhood Essay Did you like this example? Introduction I will be examining the relationship between an adopted child age 7 and the adoptive parents. These three people are in different crisis at different times in their lives. A topic we will discuss further in this paper. To do this I will explain this by using real life experience, and the thought process that goes through each of the people involved. Eriksons psychosocial stages will be research based of Knowles text Human Development and Human Possibility: Erikson in the Light of Heidegger (1986). Eriksons stages are all said through virtues. To help explain what each virtue is, Erikson talks about each stage of the crisis, relationships, and malignancies. In my case, we will talk about Initiative vs. Guilt. This would be known as the preschool stage, but in my situation I will be talking more about my interaction with other children and parents rather than the age portion. The relationship I will be discussing is between myself adopted child and my parents. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Middle-Aged Childhood" essay for you Create order In all honesty I would have to say trust vs mistrust should be thrown into the mix here, for myself personally. You may not know I was born in Vladivostok, Russia as Alexandra Mikhailovna Kolupaeva. I was born to Alexandra Ivanova Kolupaeva and was the youngest of 8 children all of whom were also put up for adoption, the area I was born in was very impoverished. Needless to say we did not eat well in the orphanage, nor did we receive any medical or dental care. For a Fact I had never seen a Dr., or a Dentist until I moved to Seattle. My sibling and I were all separated once we arrived at the orphanage. I was at the orphanage for 4 years from what I had read in my paperwork. From what I could remember, I was young when I was put in the orphanage that I was deprived of a loving/caring relationship with any adult. Being hugged as a child was something I would try to avoid at all costs. Unfortunately I was physically abused so every time an adult went to hug me, I was prepared to be hit. The deeper we get into this paper the further our relationship between the child and parents blossoms. Eriksons theory of Initiative vs. Guilt, he states that it is vital for children to interact with children their own age; so they can learn right from wrong. It can be detrimental to a child who has not interacted with children their own age. Inter-stage Scenario It is no small secret that the area of Russia I grew up in was poverty-stricken. I dont know if you can even call it growing up. I was told that I was with my mom for 18 months until the day she couldnt take care of me. My earliest childhood memories are of the orphanage. I had one older sister that I knew of but since we were different ages we were not in the same orphanage. Not only did I have lots of anger but I was filled with pain, abandonment and betrayal. Not being around any of my family members, probably caused me not to understand the family dynamic when I was adopted. My parents knew what they were getting into when they adopted me. They had adopted a child (my brother) a few years before from Romania, so they knew that it would be hard for me to adjust. They didnt know that because I was older that I would be emotionally closed off from any contact. I had completely shut myself off from any affection or anything that involved family. It made it hard for my parents to help me understand that they were here to love me and give me a better life. They came to terms that I would never fully grasp the understanding of family nor want to make that bond which made them sad/worried about me down the road. My parents knew that they couldnt give up on me, they were determined to open my eyes to show me the value that I had in myself but never knew. My relationship with my father was better than with my mom. From what he had told me, before I even spoke English he took me skiing and loved it which made my bond that much stronger with him. My mom had feelings of inadequacy, low self-esteem, dependency, an absence of acceptance and the ability to deal with me (Tibbits-Kleber and Howell). Despite my brother came at 4 years old from Romania the bonding however were not as hard to overcome. I believe that due the age difference at arrival I was more prone to distrust. I didnt want another mother to fail me. Me: Psychosocial Crisis Ever since I could remember I was taken from my moms hands at 18 months old. I do not remember anything about my mother. I didnt have a connection with her for all I knew, she was dead to me, she had done the one thing that made any child feel alone in the world. I didnt fully realize what she had done to me until I was adopted and my adoptive parents told me that I was taken away. My mother believed that what she was doing, was the best thing for me. She wanted me to have the chance at a better life than what she had. My parents had told me that because my mom was sick and very poor, that she couldnt provide a stable home for any of her kids. At that moment in my life I was filled with so much anger, hatred towards her that till this day I cant forgive her. I had lost all trust in any adults that tried to care for me. When I came to Seattle in 2003 I didnt trust my new mom, I had the idea that she would abandon me as well. I always thought that the reason my mother had surrendered me was because I was the problem. Little did I know it was because she simply just didnt have the funding to look after me and that she was sick. I didnt understand why someone would give up their child for alcohol and yes I knew she was sick, but still. Why put a kid who didnt do anything wrong through all that pain that will endure further down their life. Looking back there was no way that I could come to the United States and automatically fit into an American family and culture. Coming to America was a whole new experience for me. From living in an orphanage in a small village, I took my very first plane ride to the capital city, Moscow. My new dad gave me a set of headphones and let me listen to music on the plane. I got to stay in a hotel, wear American clothes and see a big city. It was a whole new world, it was a culture shock to the nth degree. Being part of a family, adjusting culturally, learning a new language, integrating into a new school, learning academics was new for me. Since I was seven years old I would be experiencing the virtues of Hope and Purpose, for the sake of being adopted I had to relearn everything that a baby would learn as they were growing up. My mother always had hope that one day she and I would have the bond that my father and I had and still have till this day. As Knowles puts it, hope is the perception of the world as an invitation to live (Knowles,1986). The means to open up, whether that is by being vulnerable, fearful etc. I would do everything in my power to stay away from this virtue of hope. I didnt want to let this person that I barely know have a relationship with me. The desire to understand and make sense of a damaged child and provide care was intense for my parents (Hull). I had the commitment and resilience on not having to make the effort to know who my parents where or what the world had to offer. Resilience is the understanding of two things; elasticity and recovery (Whilst). As I have been growing over the years not just as a person, but also my beliefs in faith and relationships. My relationship over the past has dramatically taken a turn with my mother as with my father. I have become closer to my mom and fully understand and take into heart everything that she has done for me. I now realize that all she wanted was the best for me and to show me that I was worth saving. For that reason, it is because of her that I have come to fully forgive my biological mother. It is not easy to be a m om and especially to someone who was adopted. Parents: Psychosocial Crisis Before my brother and I came into my parents life, they had tried to have kids of their own. Being unable to have their own, they decided to go through the process of adoption. Frankie had been with my parents for approximately 2 years when my parents felt that Frankie had bonded with them and vise versa, and it was time to expand the family. My mother has always told me that she didnt want to raise an only child because she married one. My mom felt that it was important for a child to learn how to share and play with others. This began the adoption process of me. They decided to contact the same agency and look for either a brother or a sister for Frankie. Knowles (1986) virtue of commitment is exemplified in my parents adoption of Frankie and their second adoption, which was me. Frankie was a waiting child in Romania, abandoned at birth and living in a orphanage. He desperately needed a family who would love and nurture him and my parents answered that call. Once again my parents demonstrated the virtue of commitment when they answered the call to adopt me. Like Frankie, I was living in an orphanage (this time Russia not Romania). I too was waiting for a family that would love and nurture me. When my parents made the commitment to adopt Frankie, they told only family and close friends. While this was an exciting change to their lives, they were extremely apprehensive about the change this would bring to their lives. Therefore they decided to answer the call but keep the news fairly private. When my parents answered the call to my adoption, Frankie was already in first grade and my parents let the school and the school families know of their plan. As the time got closer for me to come to America the school families threw my parents a large baby shower where all of the first grade parents were in attendance. The point being is that my parents with Frankies adoption were much more selective and restrictive with sharing the news, but with me, they were more comfortable having gone through the process already that they shared the news more openly. My parents would be experiencing the virtue of purpose when they adopted me. Knowles (1986) describes this as the task for the sake of being active and on the move. Mom and Dad had felt that they had to constantly be on the go and take every action they needed to help me develop as a young lady. I could also put the virtue of commitment in this situation, because my parents were committed to teaching me the value of being part of the family. My parents had made sure that they knew that my brother and I were adopted and that we knew what adoption meant (Reinoso, 2012). Any time my brother or I had any questions, my parents answered as honestly and as openly as they could. They shared all information that they had access to and never shied away from the issue of adoption and what it meant to our family. My parents became fulfilled as individuals through adoption. Adoption was how they formed their family while we may not be blood related we have formed a bond that makes us a family. My brother and I grew up as siblings; typically, we loved and hated each other at the same time. We watched our for each other were outsiders were concerned, but suffered through the sibling rivalry of any other family. Adoption creates good parenting, because you say okay, I dont know who you are, so I will let you be whoever you are and I will just sit back and wait and discover what that is and celebrate it with you (Daniluk Hurtig-Mitchell, 2003, p 396). It helped the parents find their identity within the kid. Their purpose in life as a care take or in some cases as rescuers for adopted children. Conclusion Being adopted has benefited both me and my parents. I have gained loving parents and a brother, they love me and look out for me, worship me, adore me. They have created a family unit that was otherwise was not possibly other than through adoption. It hasnt always been easy, I know that at times I have tested their patience and vise versa. There were days I thought I would never fit in and im sure they thought the same way. I have learned that the mistakes i have made along the way, have a profound effect on who I am today. My parents love and guidance helped acclimate me to life in America. It hasnt always been easy being a part of a family unit, and there have been times when I rebelled but at the end of the day I respect that my parents are my parents and anything they did or said was only for my best interest. There were many stories were international adoption has gone horribly wrong for various reasons but I know that in mine and my brothers cases my parents love us and have nurtured us and want us to be the best that we can be. We have been integrated into the American culture to take advantages of the opportunities that come our way.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Proposal For The Windows Security Management - 1563 Words

Proposal For the Windows Security Management of â€Å"NextGuard† Organization Introduction NextGard Technologies, an organization located in Phoenix, AZ which have some specific specialization in offering the network consultation services like security and privacy related concerns for the various American clients. The company has presently different offices in the five states of the various countries including Atlanta, Georgia, Los Angeles, New York, etc. The headquarter is in Phoenix, AZ. The organization proposed a solution for the implementation of the model for the privacy and security purpose for the employees of the organization. The company employees generally utilize the different devices and workstations with the internet connection†¦show more content†¦At the point when conveyed deliberately, Windows Access Control advancements can give essential segments of a more extensive arrangement of approaches and advances that oversee security chances successfully, empower consistent with regulations, ensure business resources and protected innovation, and decre ase the danger of obligation. (csrc.nist.gov) Role-Based Access control: In the RBAC organization, clients can be allocated to parts, for example, specialist, legal advisor, or creditor liabilities agent. Once the parts have been relegated, business standards, for example, no one but specialists can get to therapeutic data can be characterized. Security bunches in Active Directory could likewise be utilized to perform a portion of the same usefulness. Components solutions of the Access control mechanism of the organization Access Policy supervision, is the segment of access control that guarantees fine-grained and dependable approval of clients in light of tenets and parts. Access control strategy characterizes the errands that essential can perform and assets they can get to, and gives a review trail to consistence purposes. The establishment of a powerful get to control framework is the respectability of the working framework itself. In the event that the framework (equipment or programming) is traded off, noxious code can change applications and information without being identified, consequently rendering whatever is left of the security

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Dashman Case free essay sample

The Dashman Company was a large decentralized concern making many types of equipment for the armed forces of the United States. Late in 1940 the company faced increasing difficulty in securing certain essential raw materials. So Mr. Manson, the company’s president, created Central Purchasing department and appointed, Mr. Post, an experienced purchasing executive, as vice president in charge of purchasing. Mr. Post has proposed one strategy, notifying him contract in excess of $ 10000 a week in advance of signing them. Same was approved by board and communicated in writing to the purchasing department of all plants. But net result is: there is no improvement in purchasing process. Analysis:- 1. Scarcity of resources and their improper utilization. 2. Lack of coordination within the plants and Head office. 3. There is no involvement of Plant purchase head while taking a decision of purchase centralization by Mr. Post. 4. Vague strategy by Mr. Post. 5. No result oriented action plan by Mr. We will write a custom essay sample on Dashman Case or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Post. 6. Because of which the rigidity for acceptance has been seen from plants. . Lack of ownership of the job responsibility both by Mr. Post and Mr. Larsen. (Mr. Post could have used Mr. Larsen’s experience to know about their org. behavior as well as Mr. Larsen could have taken self initiative to visit the plants. ) 8. No proper reviewing or monitoring system implemented. 9. Similarly no feedback systems implemented for plants. 10. As a MD of a company, Mr. Manson would have reviewed this concept of centralization and its action plan. 11. Human behavior:- a) Mr. Post is acting like a Dictator and he is impulsive. b) Lack of implementation of ideas and action on it. c) Lack of job-role clarity (as Mr. Post was sitting idle for 6 months instead of reviewing it. Mr. Larson could have taken self-initiative). d) No ownership of their responsibilities. e) Without proper communication, the centralization strategy implemented, which was not accepted by every plant. Every plant purchase manager showing rigidity and were not in company’s growth with the concept of centralization

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Same Sex Unions Essays (936 words) - John Boswell, Same-sex Marriage

Same Sex Unions The question of same-sex unions and their legitimacy in many different societies is a topic that has been hotly debated for centuries. One society in particular is pre-modern Europe. Noted author and historian Dr. John Boswell looks extensively at the topic of same-sex unions in his book Same Sex Unions in Premodern Europe. Dr. Boswell argues extensively in his book that the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches not only sanctioned unions between partners of the same sex, but actually sanctified them. This critique examines some specific aspects of the book, and analyzes them. Before an analysis of the Same Sex Unions in Premodern Europe can be evaluated, it's important to know a little about the author himself and what he stood for. Dr. Boswell was a professor at Yale University and Chairman of Yale's history department for many years. He was an award winning scholar, author and historian. In addition to writing Same Sex Unions in Premodern Europe he also wrote several other works such as Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality. Two of his greatest professional achievements included being a Woodrow Wilson Fellow and a Fulbright scholar. It is his extensive training as a Historian and an understanding of his own homosexuality that gave him unique insight into the writing of Same Sex Unions in Premodern Europe. In Same Sex Unions in Modern Europe, Boswell takes a highly controversial position in saying that the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches actually sanctified same sex unions, while at the same time, presenting his viewpoints in such a way that any well educated historian would... very carefully. He almost contradicts himself at several points in the book and mentions that his ideas are subject to debate among his peers. Boswell, in writing this book has essentially established a Premodern Europe where heterosexual marriage was largely ignored by pagans and discouraged by the church. Also, according to Boswell, men would essentially pair off in order to perform duties that were considered essential to society such as war, trade, education, friendship, etc. As Boswell puts it "it is hardly surprising that there should been a Christian solemnizing same sex unions." I do not agree with him on this premise, although homosexuality has existed in animal species and in humans since the beginnings of our existence, how can he be so bold as to assume that the majority of these supposed pairs were homosexual? In my opinion that broad of a statement is like saying that any two men that shake hands or embrace must automatically be gay. There is a second specific point that I wish to point out with regards to medieval priest and the monastic life. Boswell points out in Same Sex Unions in Premodern Europe that young boys caught performing homosexual acts were "punished" by being sent to a monastery. Was this meant as "punishment" to deprive these boys of their youth or to isolate them from the supposed forces that made them perform these acts? Boswell points out "in any event, being placed with monks was likely to provide the best environment to locate other men romantically interested in their own gender." That's all well and good, but he undermines his own thesis here. If the Christian Right of the time so vehemently supported same sex unions, then why would boys who engaged in same-sex acts be "punished" at all? Should not they be encouraged to be homosexual? Boswell not only mildly contradicts himself here, he goes a step further and practically destroys his own thesis. Through reading Same Sex Unions in Premodern Europe, relating it to my own experiences as a history major, and gay male, not to mention discussions in class, I do not believe that same sex unions were as heavily sanctioned in Premodern Europe by churches as Boswell would have us believe. It is my opinion that there have fluctuations between then and now as to exactly how much homosexuality is tolerated by the so-called mainstream society. There were places such as Ancient Greece where it was accepted and modern day liberal locations such as San Francisco, California that have a large gay/lesbian population. In both places both in the past and present, a certain percentage of religions Christian or non-Christian have spoken out against same sex unions. In one respect I can agree with Boswell in that perhaps in the past (in certain premodern Europe geographical locations) that same sex unions were more tolerated than they are today here in the United States. This is especially true in the so called "Bible Belt" which